Capstone: Scaling & Operating a RAG Platform

The final lesson of the LLM Integration track. Assemble everything — retrieval and reranking, agentic tool use, conversational memory, evaluation, observability, fine-tuning, and optimized serving — into one production RAG platform, and walk the capacity, cost, reliability, and rollout decisions that keep it running at scale.

Day 5 Progress0%

The Platform Architecture

Across this track you built the pieces. Beginner: the five-stage RAG pipeline and a Q&A bot. Intermediate: reranking, agentic tool use, conversational memory, and evaluation. Advanced: observability, fine-tuning, and optimized serving. The capstone assembles them into one system you could actually run for a regulated-industry customer.

The Whole System on One Page

A production RAG platform is two planes that share a store.

                       ┌──────────────  CONTROL / OFFLINE  ──────────────┐
  sources ─► ingest ─► chunk ─► embed ─► [vector store + metadata]       │
                                              ▲        ▲                  │
                                              │        │   eval harness ◄─┤ (Day 4)
                                              │        │   fine-tune    ◄─┤ (Adv Day 2)
                       └──────────────────────┼────────┼─────────────────┘
                                              │        │
  user ─► gateway ─► contextualize ─► retrieve ─► rerank ─► [agent?] ─► generate ─► answer+cites
            (auth,      (Int Day 3      (top-N)    (top-K     (Int       (served on
            tenancy,     memory)                    Int        Day 2      vLLM/TGI,
            limits)                                 Day 1)     tools)     Adv Day 3)
                                  └──────── traced end to end (Adv Day 1) ────────┘

The request path (bottom) is the hot path — every user query flows through it and it must be fast and reliable. The control plane (top) runs offline: ingestion, fine-tuning, and the evaluation harness that samples real traffic and tells you whether the hot path is still good.

The Seams That Matter

A platform is defined less by its boxes than by the contracts between them:

  • Retrieve → Rerank: retrieval over-fetches top-N for recall; rerank narrows to top-K for precision. The seam is the candidate set size N.
  • Rerank → Generate: the reranker's calibrated score gates the prompt — below threshold, refuse rather than feed weak context.
  • Memory ↔ Retrieve: conversational state contextualizes the query before retrieval, so follow-ups retrieve the right thing.
  • Everything → Observability: every stage emits a span. Without this seam you are flying blind in production.

Designing Backwards from Requirements

Senior engineers design the platform backwards from three numbers: peak QPS, latency SLO, and the cost ceiling. Those three constrain every box — how many serving replicas, whether you can afford a reranker on every call, how aggressively you cache. The rest of this lesson walks those decisions in order.

Key Takeaways
  • A RAG platform is a hot request path (contextualize → retrieve → rerank → generate) plus an offline control plane (ingest, fine-tune, evaluate) sharing the store
  • The contracts between stages — over-fetch N, rerank-score gate, memory-before-retrieval — matter more than the boxes themselves
  • Design backwards from three numbers: peak QPS, latency SLO, and cost ceiling; they constrain every component choice

AI Learning Assistant

Powered by advanced LLM

Get personalized help with concepts, code examples, and explanations tailored to your learning pace.

Course Stats

Estimated Time
60 min
Lessons
5 sections